|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
Data corrente: |
25/11/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
16/01/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
QUEIROZ, P.; TOGAWA, R. C.; MARTINS, E.; GRYNBERG, P.; MONNERAT, R. |
Afiliação: |
PAULO QUEIROZ, Centro Universitário de Brasília; ROBERTO COITI TOGAWA, Cenargen; ÉRICA MARTINS, Universidade de Brasília; PRISCILA GRYNBERG, Cenargen; ROSE MONNERAT. |
Título: |
Draft genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis strain S1287, an isolate showing insecticidal activity against coleoptera. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brazilian Applied Science Review, v. 6, n. 3, p. 925-929, 2022. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv6n3-009 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
Na publicação: Roberto Togawa. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Boll weevil; Cry genes; Genes de choro; Gorgulho de boll; Proteínas inseticidas. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Insecticidal proteins. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/245108/1/adminBASR009Maio-1.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00832naa a2200253 a 4500 001 2148796 005 2023-01-16 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.34115/basrv6n3-009$2DOI 100 1 $aQUEIROZ, P. 245 $aDraft genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis strain S1287, an isolate showing insecticidal activity against coleoptera.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aNa publicação: Roberto Togawa. 650 $aInsecticidal proteins 653 $aBoll weevil 653 $aCry genes 653 $aGenes de choro 653 $aGorgulho de boll 653 $aProteínas inseticidas 700 1 $aTOGAWA, R. C. 700 1 $aMARTINS, E. 700 1 $aGRYNBERG, P. 700 1 $aMONNERAT, R. 773 $tBrazilian Applied Science Review$gv. 6, n. 3, p. 925-929, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (CENARGEN) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
24/08/2015 |
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2016 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
AZEVEDO, C. F.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F. e; VIANA, J. M. S.; VALENTE, M. S. F.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P. |
Afiliação: |
Camila Ferreira Azevedo, UFV; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; Fabyano Fonseca e Silva, UFV; José Marcelo Soriano Viana, UFV; Magno Sávio Ferreira Valente, UFV; Márcio Fernando Ribeiro Resende Jr, Florida Innovation Hub; Patricio Muñoz, University of Florida. |
Título: |
Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive dominance genomic models. |
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
BMC Genetics, v. 16, art. 105, Aug. 2015. 13 p. |
DOI: |
10.1186/s12863-015-0264-2 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Background: A complete approach for genome-wide selection (GWS) involves reliable statistical genetics models and methods. Reports on this topic are common for additive genetic models but not for additive-dominance models. The objective of this paper was (i) to compare the performance of 10 additive-dominance predictive models (including current models and proposed modifications), fitted using Bayesian, Lasso and Ridge regression approaches; and (ii) to decompose genomic heritability and accuracy in terms of three quantitative genetic information sources, namely, linkage disequilibrium (LD), co-segregation (CS) and pedigree relationships or family structure (PR). The simulation study considered two broad sense heritability levels (0.30 and 0.50, associated with narrow sense heritabilities of 0.20 and 0.35, respectively) and two genetic architectures for traits (the first consisting of small gene effects and the second consisting of a mixed inheritance model with five major genes). Results: G-REML/G-BLUP and a modified Bayesian/Lasso (called BayesA*B* or t-BLASSO) method performed best in the prediction of genomic breeding as well as the total genotypic values of individuals in all four scenarios (two heritabilities x two genetic architectures). The BayesA*B*-type method showed a better ability to recover the dominance variance/additive variance ratio. Decomposition of genomic heritability and accuracy revealed the following descending importance order of information: LD, CS and PR not captured by markers, the last two being very close. Conclusions: Amongst the 10 models/methods evaluated, the G-BLUP, BAYESA*B* (−2,8) and BAYESA*B* (4,6) methods presented the best results and were found to be adequate for accurately predicting genomic breeding and total genotypic values as well as for estimating additive and dominance in additive-dominance genomic models. MenosBackground: A complete approach for genome-wide selection (GWS) involves reliable statistical genetics models and methods. Reports on this topic are common for additive genetic models but not for additive-dominance models. The objective of this paper was (i) to compare the performance of 10 additive-dominance predictive models (including current models and proposed modifications), fitted using Bayesian, Lasso and Ridge regression approaches; and (ii) to decompose genomic heritability and accuracy in terms of three quantitative genetic information sources, namely, linkage disequilibrium (LD), co-segregation (CS) and pedigree relationships or family structure (PR). The simulation study considered two broad sense heritability levels (0.30 and 0.50, associated with narrow sense heritabilities of 0.20 and 0.35, respectively) and two genetic architectures for traits (the first consisting of small gene effects and the second consisting of a mixed inheritance model with five major genes). Results: G-REML/G-BLUP and a modified Bayesian/Lasso (called BayesA*B* or t-BLASSO) method performed best in the prediction of genomic breeding as well as the total genotypic values of individuals in all four scenarios (two heritabilities x two genetic architectures). The BayesA*B*-type method showed a better ability to recover the dominance variance/additive variance ratio. Decomposition of genomic heritability and accuracy revealed the following descending importance order of information: LD, CS ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Bayesian methods; Dominance genomic models; Genética quantitativa; Lasso methods; Melhoramento genético; Modelo Bayesiano; Selection accuracy. |
Thesagro: |
Parâmetro Genético. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/128510/1/2015-API-Deon-Ridge.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02783naa a2200301 a 4500 001 2022575 005 2016-02-25 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1186/s12863-015-0264-2$2DOI 100 1 $aAZEVEDO, C. F. 245 $aRidge, Lasso and Bayesian additive dominance genomic models.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 520 $aBackground: A complete approach for genome-wide selection (GWS) involves reliable statistical genetics models and methods. Reports on this topic are common for additive genetic models but not for additive-dominance models. The objective of this paper was (i) to compare the performance of 10 additive-dominance predictive models (including current models and proposed modifications), fitted using Bayesian, Lasso and Ridge regression approaches; and (ii) to decompose genomic heritability and accuracy in terms of three quantitative genetic information sources, namely, linkage disequilibrium (LD), co-segregation (CS) and pedigree relationships or family structure (PR). The simulation study considered two broad sense heritability levels (0.30 and 0.50, associated with narrow sense heritabilities of 0.20 and 0.35, respectively) and two genetic architectures for traits (the first consisting of small gene effects and the second consisting of a mixed inheritance model with five major genes). Results: G-REML/G-BLUP and a modified Bayesian/Lasso (called BayesA*B* or t-BLASSO) method performed best in the prediction of genomic breeding as well as the total genotypic values of individuals in all four scenarios (two heritabilities x two genetic architectures). The BayesA*B*-type method showed a better ability to recover the dominance variance/additive variance ratio. Decomposition of genomic heritability and accuracy revealed the following descending importance order of information: LD, CS and PR not captured by markers, the last two being very close. Conclusions: Amongst the 10 models/methods evaluated, the G-BLUP, BAYESA*B* (−2,8) and BAYESA*B* (4,6) methods presented the best results and were found to be adequate for accurately predicting genomic breeding and total genotypic values as well as for estimating additive and dominance in additive-dominance genomic models. 650 $aParâmetro Genético 653 $aBayesian methods 653 $aDominance genomic models 653 $aGenética quantitativa 653 $aLasso methods 653 $aMelhoramento genético 653 $aModelo Bayesiano 653 $aSelection accuracy 700 1 $aRESENDE, M. D. V. de 700 1 $aSILVA, F. F. e 700 1 $aVIANA, J. M. S. 700 1 $aVALENTE, M. S. F. 700 1 $aRESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R. 700 1 $aMUÑOZ, P. 773 $tBMC Genetics$gv. 16, art. 105, Aug. 2015. 13 p.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|